Native American Treaties

America pass that the Nation cede certain races of land, beneficial to the US, and with the agree custodyt that the unify renders could indicate garrisons where they desired In order to protect the frontiers. In transmute for the considerations and the indissoluble relinquishment of those lands and claims, the unite States agreed to pay the nation several types of compensation. firstborn was an annual monetary sum of $3000. 00 every year indefinitely to the creek Nation, with an additional $1000. 00 per year to the chiefs who administer the political scienceal services to the tribe.Also provided In the conformity was the sum of $25,000. 00, to be distributed in parts as merchandise and goods, the perplexity of debts the Nation owed, and the satisfaction of individual loss of property claims against the tribe by citizens of the united States. In addition, the united States agreed to furnish two sets of Blacksmiths tools and the men to work them for a period of three years. K State brook 1802 1 tangle as though, while I lock up dissent with the idea that these treaty agreements were in whatsoever way fair or a true option to the tribes on these lands, this particular treaty wasnt any crueler than other treaties.The land descriptions of what was to be ceded to the united States Is official for me to comprehend in any Value aspect. I am non certain of the acreage, nor would I set about to know the land value. Secondly, only part of that value was direct compensation. I find the breakdown of the larger compensation package suspect, since It virtually forgives debts that the unite States government purports the creek Indians acquired and/or for acts the government purports the brook Indians committed against the citizens of America.If the land, property, or other purported to have been taken was in actuality the creek Indians to begin with, and then it would be unfair to use land compensation as remuneration of a debt that never occurred. The se cond treaty I chose was signed high-flown 9, 1814, (also called the Treaty of Ft. Jackson) following the events surrounding the contend of 1812. Andrew Jackson was both the 1 OFF the Creek Indian tribes that culminated with the Battle of Horseshoe Bend in aluminum on March 27, 1814, and killed 800 Indian warriors and imprisoned over d women and children in the Ft Aims Massacre. Britannica Creek Indian War) The agreement was in response to Unprovoked, frigid, and sanguinary war, waged y the hostile Creeks against us and for basically violating the 1790 treaty, disregarding the previous(prenominal) genuine spirit of existing treaties. (K State Creek 1814) This treaty had more more provisions, and heavily esteemed the joined States, while laying peck to the Creek Indians for the events that lead to the massacre, and hence, this treaty which reads more as a list of spoils.The United States demanded the equivalent to all expenses for run intoing out the entirety of the war to its end. not being specifically written, I can only assume that they entirety include the Creek Indian War AND the majority of the War of 1812. The United States was penalizing the Creek Indians for affording assistance and aid to the British during the War of 1812. This equated to over 23,000,000 acres of land, negative a few reservations of 1 mile tracts per person who had remained friendly to the United States during the conflict.The US also demanded that the Creeks abandon all communications and relations with the British and the Spanish, the rights to establish military posts and trading houses on roads in territories still occupied by the Indian tribe, the right to completely free sailing of all waters, the surrender of al persons or property gained by the Creeks during the conflicts, the clutch and surrender of all instigators, and permanent peace between the Creek Indians and the United States, as well as among the Creek Indians and the Cherokee, Chicka apothegms, and Ch octaw Indian tribes.In re crimp for the demands, the Americans guaranteed the single of the Northern and North eastern aspects of their territory, as well as a Humanitarian gesture of continuing to furnish the necessaries of life Until crops are competent to yield and will establish trading houses in the Nation to modify the Nation to procure clothes By industry or economy. (K State Creek 1814) The benefit of this treaty was quite obviously in favor of the United States. There was little concession to the Indians for what amounts to half of the state of Alabama and the entire South portion of Georgia in land mass. Britannica Creek Indian War) While the wording tends to validate the demands of the US, it does not address that the War of 1812 was an occurrence during the intertribal wars that were going on at the term. Some tribes saw an opportunity to show a loyalty to the US, which further incited the opposing tribes who felt that the intrusion of the US was not permissible to act against the US, but funding the opposition in the war, or actually attacking American citizens themselves. request of Alabama) The actions of the tribes had not started as actions against the United States for the sake of war against America. Had this been the case, Jacksons generalization of unprovoked, inhuman war might be more accurate. However, at a measure in history where the United States was systematically striping land, rights, and humanity from the original people who ere in actual possession of it upon the Americans arrival is hypocritical at best.The drastic change between the style and manner of the treaties of 1802 and 1814 show the turn America took from being a participant in a mutual, albeit selfish, exchange to a punishing political power using treaties and government approve Americans was, ironically, to become President and initiate Indian Removal as form-only(prenominal) policy. With the concession as a gesture of humanity America made the Creek Tribe both more dependent on the US government for necessities they could not themselves generate now for lack of the territory they once had to farm, herd, and ark on but also began a culture of resentment with the tribe.I am not convinced this wasnt the exact objective of the humanitarian help written into the agreement. It is clear to see that while in the beginning, there was a more conservative maneuver with the treaties to maintain a certain amount of control over the indispensable tribes, there was a more concerted effort as time passed and the United States desired to take more and give less. The power first derivative is shown most vividly in the sheer volume of land taken in the 1814 treaty as equivalent to expenses.